Workplace Fairness Act: How Employers Must Handle Discrimination Complaints

discrimination complaints

The Workplace Fairness Act sets out how employers in Singapore must respond to discrimination complaints with clarity, fairness, and legal compliance. Addressing discrimination complaints is now a defined organisational responsibility, not an optional HR practice.

Singapore’s annual Fair Employment Practices reports show formal procedures help reduce discrimination at work, and fewer employees report experiencing bias at work when those procedures exist. In 2023, only about 6 per cent of employees reported workplace discrimination, down from 8.2 per cent the year before, while firms with formal procedures increased to 63.2 per cent.

For HR leaders and people operations managers, understanding these requirements is essential for legal compliance, employee trust, and organisational performance.

Understanding the Workplace Fairness Act

The Workplace Fairness Act creates duties for employers to prevent and address discrimination systematically. It applies to protected characteristics recognised under Singapore employment norms, including age, race, sex, disability, religion, nationality, and more.

The Act doesn’t just prohibit unfair actions. It requires employers to respond to discrimination complaints with documented processes, qualified investigations, and fair outcomes.

Non-compliance can lead to legal exposure, regulatory scrutiny, and damage to reputation.

What Counts as Discrimination Under the Act

Discrimination under Singapore’s workplace laws includes actions and systems that treat people unfairly because of personal attributes. The Act’s definitions guide how complaints are evaluated and resolved.

Direct Discrimination

Direct discrimination is when an individual is treated less favourably because of a protected characteristic.

This might include decisions on hiring, pay, promotions, or work allocation that are influenced by age, gender, race, or disability.

Intent does not have to be proven. The focus is on whether unequal treatment occurred.

Indirect Discrimination

Indirect discrimination arises when a policy or workplace rule disadvantages a group of people linked by a protected characteristic.

For example, a rule that all employees must be available on a specific religious holiday can disproportionately disadvantage people of that faith unless there is a justifiable reason.

These cases often require deeper analysis of policy impact.

Harassment Linked to Protected Traits

The Workplace Fairness Act does not define harassment. In Singapore, harassment is defined under the Protection from Harassment Act 2014. 

However, workplace conduct may amount to discrimination under the Workplace Fairness Act if it relates to a protected characteristic. Employers must assess both legal frameworks when handling related discrimination complaints.

Harassment refers to unwelcome conduct that makes the work environment hostile, degrading, or offensive.

It may be verbal, physical, or digital. Serious single incidents can qualify as harassment even without repetition.

Employers must recognise behaviours that create an unsafe or uncomfortable workplace tied to protected characteristics.

Employer Duties Once a Complaint Is Raised

When discrimination complaints are reported, employers must comply with the duties set out under the Workplace Fairness Act. The Act requires employers to establish and implement a grievance handling process for workplace discrimination.

Employers must:

  • Provide a process for employees to raise workplace discrimination grievances
  • Handle grievances in a timely manner
  • Deal with grievances fairly and without bias
  • Inform the employee of the outcome of the grievance
  • Keep records of grievances and how they were addressed
  • Ensure no adverse action is taken against a person for making or supporting a grievance

These duties focus on process integrity and protection from retaliation. While organisations may choose to adopt additional internal measures such as formal investigations or structured timelines, the legal obligation is to maintain and implement a fair grievance process consistent with the Act.

Handling Discrimination Complaints Lawfully

The Workplace Fairness Act requires employers to establish and implement a grievance handling process for workplace discrimination. The focus is on timeliness, fairness, and proper resolution of discrimination complaints.

Receiving and Processing a Grievance

Employers must provide employees with a process to raise workplace discrimination grievances. This process must be accessible and communicated to employees.

Once a grievance is raised, the employer must handle it in a timely manner and in accordance with its established procedures. The Act emphasises proper handling rather than prescribing specific investigative models.

Fair Consideration of the Grievance

The Act requires employers to deal with grievances fairly. This means considering the allegations, reviewing relevant information, and assessing the matter without bias.

Employers must ensure that the grievance is properly examined before reaching a conclusion. A predetermined or superficial response would not meet the standard of fair handling.

Informing the Employee of the Outcome

After considering the grievance, the employer must inform the employee of the outcome. The legislation requires that the employee be notified, though it does not prescribe a specific format.

The outcome should reflect that the grievance was assessed under the employer’s grievance handling process.

Documentation and Record Keeping Requirements

The Workplace Fairness Act expects clear documentation at every stage. Records support transparency and form the backbone of legal defence if disputes escalate.

Employers must retain documentation showing:

  • The grievance raised
  • The steps taken to address the grievance
  • The outcome of the grievance

Records must be maintained in accordance with the Act and any applicable employment or data protection requirements. Proper documentation demonstrates compliance if reviewed by authorities.

Protection Against Retaliation

The Workplace Fairness Act prohibits employers from taking adverse action against a person because they made or supported a workplace discrimination grievance.

Adverse action includes dismissal, demotion, reduction in pay, or other disadvantage linked to the grievance. This protection applies throughout and after the grievance process.

Employers must ensure that no retaliatory conduct occurs as a result of discrimination complaints. Compliance requires active prevention of adverse treatment connected to the grievance.

Training Managers and HR Teams

Frontline managers often encounter discrimination complaints first. Training equips them to respond appropriately.

Training should cover escalation rules, documentation expectations, and neutrality. Avoid informal promises or opinions that undermine formal process integrity.

Well-trained teams reduce organisational risk and promote employee confidence.

The Role of DEI Consultancy in Complaint Handling

DEI consultancy strengthens lawful handling by reviewing grievance frameworks and investigation practices. External advisors help identify gaps and build compliant processes.

Consultants also support policy alignment, manager training, and audit readiness. This layer of expertise elevates fairness and evidence quality, helping leaders manage discrimination complaints with confidence.

Aligning Policies With Workplace Culture

Policies alone do not ensure compliance. Employees must understand and trust the process.

Clear communication from leadership and visible commitment reinforce the policy’s effectiveness. Regular reviews ensure alignment with legal expectations and workforce needs.

Workplace fairness becomes part of the organisational culture, not just a written procedure.

Preparing for Audits and Legal Scrutiny

Regulators and tribunals assess readiness based on documentation, training records, and process clarity. Preparation protects organisations when issues arise.

Mock audits and policy reviews identify weaknesses before they become problems. External DEI consultants can offer specialist support here.

Conclusion

Handling discrimination complaints in Singapore requires more than good intent. The Workplace Fairness Act demands structured, fair, and well-documented processes.

Formal grievance frameworks backed by strong policy and trained teams help protect organisations and employees alike. Investing in DEI advisory and compliant complaint handling builds trust, reduces legal risk, and supports a more inclusive workplace.If you need help ensuring your complaint handling and compliance are aligned with the new fairness requirements, contact Include Consulting for expert support.

Ready to talk?

We partner with driven leaders committed to create workplaces where equality and inclusion thrive.

Together, we’ll take purposeful steps toward shaping a more inclusive, equitable, and sustainable future within your organisation and beyond.

    Singapore’s Workplace Fairness Act (WFA) is a landmark shift in local employment law. Passed on 8 January 2025 and expected...

    Women’s Month in Singapore is a timely opportunity for HR and rewards teams to review how pay decisions work in...

    Leadership pipelines determine who gets developed, promoted, and trusted with authority. In many organisations, these systems appear neutral and performance-based....